An Invitation

[Disclaimer: I'm excited about this simple discovery...  I'd insert one of those Paperless Post animated flyers here if I knew how!]

Last week, I attended a writing class for aspiring children's authors, led by  a set of successful children's authors.  In this class, we learned about craft and participated in critique groups.  In one of the critique sessions, our instructor expertly guided our team in supporting a colleague as she shared a traumatic experience...In a show of empathy, our author coach told us about a book she'd published that was not a great seller, but was a fictionalized autobiography of growing up with a chemically dependent parent.

Later, she and I talked about the cathartic benefit of getting these experiences out on paper.  She shared that she'd changed some details of her own life for the benefit of the YA story, but that yes, it had absolutely helped her process.  I asked her thoughts about how teachers should go about getting these books into kids' hands. After all, as she'd shared, topics of abuse, neglect and family trauma are not feel-good stories, and don't headline publishers' rosters.  They are not emphasized when selling to librarians or teachers, and often these important books--"mirror experiences," in the words of Dr. Rudine Sims Bishop--become obscured and invisible.  The author told me, wisely, that  we just have to make sure we give them to kids we know are struggling with certain challenges at home. Then I realized mid-stream in our conversation, that I knew the answer to my own question...it went beyond sharing particular books with particular kids. Here's what I realized...

My first thought was, yes! Let's give the right book to the right kid to make sure they see it.  But then I thought about Mr. Manny Scott, the author and speaker I'd recently seen who shared how carefully he'd hid his family drama from schools due to shame and isolation.  How many of the kids who need these books, I thought, would never let on that they do? So how can we rely upon our knowledge to know who should have access to them? 

My next thought? Book talks. Fountas and Pinnell, renowned literacy experts, tout book talks as powerful ways for teachers to give little "commercials" in their literacy classrooms, to expose kids to new books, new authors, new content.  I realized in my conversation with the author that this is the answer.  We must encourage children to access these books that have the potential to shore them up in their hardest times--this means sharing them with everyone and just making them available...Not necessarily choosing who should read  or know about a particular title--just sharing...and letting the books find the hungry hands that need them.  

And so, I am inviting myself--and I want to invite you--to do just that. Find some of these books.  Read some. Share as book talks and make copies available. Make YOURSELF available. Maybe we can be someone's lifeline...or at least point to one...

Closing the Feedback Loop to Nowhere

Feedback in education Is like oxygen. Both students and staff members feed off of the information and direction provided by an "other" who is able to observe our practices and give us their perspective on how we're thriving and how we can improve. What happens when feedback becomes mechanical and perfunctory, though--when we give it because we know we have to, but neither the giver nor receiver expect it to mean much or are moved by the opportunities it implies? What happens in cases where those soliciting the feedback have power and want to gather the thoughts of those in the trenches, but no one ever sees the fruit of the feedback received? I call this the feedback loop to nowhere. People grow weary of even trying to share their thoughts in this scenario. They come to know that surveys and focus groups and evaluations, even, become a compliance function and don't really help to drive change. But to my absolute delight, I have been reminded recently but there is another way!

I think I've always tried to use feedback in authentic ways whenever I have requested it. However, I'm sure that I have been guilty of not truly honoring the voices I bring to any given table. I want to do better. I want kaizen to be my middle name! :-) and so, I'm writing this to share with you a recent experience where I got to see what it really looks like to close the feedback loop to nowhere.

Earlier in the year, I was given an assignment by my new boss in my new job: to create videos that could model tips, tools or strategies that our district's families could use to help their early literacy learners. No problem! Never mind the fact that I had never created such a product. I'm always up for learning! I went about the task of building the experience from the ground up. I recruited staff members from within our system to help create the content, working with them to decide on standards and areas of focus,. I started  learning script writing and co-created scripts with my colleagues. I set up filming sessions with our communications department , and have  served as the overall producer of the project. 

The first video team, which had planned  a kindergarten-focused video, had to withdraw from the project, so I stepped in and recorded myself with my  kindergarten son. I wrote the script, videotaped my introduction, and we filmed my son and me in action for the video's demo portion. Our videographer edited the footage into a nice-looking final product, complete with captions on screen, etc. We received favorable feedback from my supervisor and  colleagues who watched the final product. Although there were things about the video I wished I could have changed, I felt iffy about asking 

our videographer to make changes. I know how much work he had to have put in for the first version, after all! Then, it happened...

My supervisor is really good about getting the feedback of different stakeholders in any particular process in order to have a true sense of how end users would experience it. She suggested I solicit the thoughts of some of our parents who serve in a special district advisory capacity.  So I pulled together a small focus group of three of them--a recommended trio of very involved, education-savvy mothers. I expected to sit with them and hear their thoughts for how we might revisit our film footage and make tiny tweaks. But that is not what I got! By the time those ladies had finished, their very specific and insightful feedback had convinced me that I probably just needed to scrap the first video and start all over! Not at all the outcome I had expected, but it was the only reasonable thing to do given how compelling their feedback was and how it impacted me. And so, back to the drawing board we went.   

I added and rearranged parts of the script. I found a new book to feature in our video, and scheduled a re-filming of both my introduction and the demo with my son. To be honest, I was amazed that our videographer was game! (I will always give him props for that.) We filmed a brand new video.  On filming day, I emailed all of those focus group participants with lavish praise for their willingness to give me meaningful information about my work. I detailed all of the changes they had suggested and let them know what the response had been to each one--how I had used their feedback. 

I think in the end, we were all pleased with the return on investment for the time we spent together going over that initial video. It will no doubt reap dividends for our entire school district! But what if things had gone the way I'm used to seeing them go in spaces where we ask people for their feedback? What if we had simply gathered in that room and I had taken notes about what those ladies said, then put my notes on the shelf? What if I had never come back to them to inform them of how I'd used their feedback and convinced them that their time spent was worth it? What if I had been unwilling to make any changes to the video even though it wasn't the best it could be? I began to ask myself these questions and I realized that our process is something I haven't really seen modeled, but I think we should do more of. How powerful would it be if every time we ask someone for their feedback, they can trust that we really want to know and that we really are open to change? I'm not saying that every effort should go again to the drawing board and begin from scratch. We all know that would be wildly inefficient. But couldn't we do a better job as education systems and even as individual educators, honoring each other's thoughts and opinions through creating more meaningful feedback loops? 

I share this story not to toot my horn. I actually only stumbled upon that process and the learning it produced. But it was a powerful stumble, and I intend to keep learning from it and replicating that kind of approach. I encourage you to take whatever you can from this story to enhance your feedback loops, as well. There is something powerful to be said for being heard, and sadly, in education we need much more of it than we currently see. So if you know anyone who can benefit from this story, please share it. Together, we have the potential to change the face of feedback in our systems and beyond!

Cheers,